"Minarchy Considered," by Richard A Garner–Libertarian Papers, vol. 1 (2009), art. no. 37
Libertarian Papers vol. 1 (2009), Art. No. 37: “Minarchy Considered,” by Richard A Garner. This paper, a thorough and withering analysis of defects of minarchist theories, highlights one advantage of the online format of Libertarian Papers: the 62-page length of the article, necessary for the in-depth case the author makes, would have been rejected or arbitrarily pared down by most journals.
Abstract: Whilst some defenders of the minimal, limited state or government hold that the state is “a necessary evil,” others would consider that this claim that the state is evil concedes too much ground to anarchists. In this article I intend to discuss the views of some who believe that government is a good thing, and their arguments for supporting this position. My main conclusions will be that, in each case, the proponents of a minimal state, or “minarchy,” fail to justify as much as what they call government, and so fail to oppose anarchism, or absences of what they call government.
Click here to read the entire article…
Related posts:
- "Minarchy Considered," by Richard A Garner (Libertarian Papers, Vol. 1 (2009), Art. no. 37)
- Libertarian Papers: on libertarian dilemmas, and probability theory
- "Feser on Rothbard as a Philosopher," by Gerard Casey [Libertarian Papers, Vol. 1 (2009), Art. No. 34]
- "Feser on Rothbard as a Philosopher," by Gerard Casey [Libertarian Papers, Vol. 1 (2009), Art. No. 34]
- "Areopagitica: Milton’s Influence on Classical and Modern Political and Economic Thought," by Isaac M. Morehouse (Libertarian Papers, Vol. 1 (2009), Art. no. 38)
